An nameless Substack submit revealed this week accuses compliance startup Delve of “falsely” convincing “tons of of shoppers they had been compliant” with privateness and safety laws, probably exposing these prospects to “felony legal responsibility beneath HIPAA and hefty fines beneath GDPR.”
Delve is a Y Combinator-backed startup that final yr introduced elevating a $32 million Sequence A at a $300 million valuation. (The spherical was led by Perception Companions.) On Friday, the startup tried to refute the accusations on its weblog, calling the Substack submit “deceptive” and saying it “comprises quite a few inaccurate claims.”
The Substack submit is credited to “DeepDelver,” who described themselves as working at a (now former) Delve consumer.
DeepDelver recounted receiving an electronic mail in December claiming the startup had “leaked a spreadsheet with confidential consumer stories.” Whereas Delve CEO Karun Kaushik apparently assured prospects in a subsequent electronic mail that they had been in compliance and that no exterior get together gained entry to delicate information, DeepDelver mentioned they and different prospects had turn out to be suspicious.
“Having the shared expertise of being underwhelmed with the Delve expertise, and having the general sense that one thing fishy was occurring, we determined to pool assets and examine collectively,” they wrote.
Their conclusion? That Delve “achieves its declare of being the quickest platform by producing pretend proof, producing auditor conclusions on behalf of certification mills that rubber stamp stories, and skipping main framework necessities whereas telling purchasers they’ve achieved 100% compliance.”
DeepDelver went into appreciable element about these claims, accusing the startup of offering prospects with “fabricated proof of board conferences, assessments, and processes that by no means occurred,” then forcing these prospects to “select between adopting pretend proof or performing principally handbook work with little actual automation or AI.”
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
DeepDelver additionally claimed that nearly all of Delve’s purchasers appear to have gone by way of two audit companies, Accorp and Gradient, which they described as “a part of the identical operation,” one which operates primarily in India, with solely a nominal presence in the US.
These companies, they mentioned, are simply rubber-stamping stories that had been generated by Delve. In consequence, DeepDelver mentioned the startup “inverts” the conventional compliance construction: “By producing auditor conclusions, check procedures, and closing stories earlier than any impartial overview happens, Delve locations itself within the position of each implementer and examiner. This isn’t a technicality. It’s a structural fraud that invalidates all the attestation.”
Along with accusing Delve of deceptive its prospects, DeepDelver mentioned the startup helps these prospects “mislead the general public by internet hosting belief pages that include safety measures that had been by no means applied.”
DeepDelver mentioned that whereas their firm was discussing its points with Delve, the startup “despatched us a number of bins of donuts […] to maintain us blissful.” Nonetheless, DeepDelver’s employer supposedly unpublished its belief web page and now not depends on the startup for compliance.
Delve responded to the accusations by saying it doesn’t subject compliance stories in any respect. As an alternative, it’s an “automation platform” that ingests details about compliance, then gives auditors with entry to that info.
“Closing stories and opinions are issued solely by impartial, licensed auditors, not Delve,” the corporate mentioned.
Delve additionally mentioned that its prospects “can choose to work with an auditor of their selecting or choose to work with one from Delve’s community of impartial, accredited third-party audit companies.” These auditors, the startup mentioned, are “established companies used broadly throughout the business, together with by different compliance platforms.”
In response to the accusation that it’s offering prospects with “pretend proof,” Delve countered that it’s merely providing “templates to assist groups doc their processes in accordance with compliance necessities, as do different compliance platforms.”
“Draft templates will not be the identical as ‘pre-filled proof,’” the corporate mentioned.
Delve added that it’s “actively investigating any leaks” and is “nonetheless reviewing the Substack.”
Following the preliminary Substack submit, an X person named James Zhou mentioned they had been capable of acquire entry to delicate info from Delve, reminiscent of worker background checks and fairness vesting schedules. Dvuln founder Jamieson O’Reilly shared extra particulars from what O’Reilly mentioned was a dialog with Zhou about “a number of gaping safety holes in Delve’s exterior assault floor.”
TechCrunch despatched an electronic mail in search of extra remark to the media contact deal with listed on Delve’s web site. The e-mail bounced, however I subsequently acquired a calendar invite for a “Delve demo” later this week. TechCrunch has additionally reached out to DeepDelver for extra remark.
This submit has been up to date with extra details about purported safety vulnerabilities supplied by Jamieson O’Reilly, and extra particulars about Delve’s response to TechCrunch.
